Has war returned to South Sudan?
'Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold'-- or can it? The peripheries of the South Sudanese state all but collapsed long ago, victim to the predatory exploitation of the ailing Salva Kiir's cabal in Juba. For years, the Machiavellian spider at the centre of South Sudan's web has presided over extreme gluttony, perpetually shuffling the capital's contorted patron-client networks to maintain his hold on power, while violence and poverty have surged in consequence. But has the government finally overplayed its hand? Having systematically violated the 2018 peace agreement, significant fighting between the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-In Opposition (SPLM-IO) and government troops has flared since the end of December.
For years, Kiir's grip has barely wavered in Juba, promoting and demoting apparent successors and pretenders to his throne at whim, most recently defenestrating Benjamin Bol Mel —the fabulously corrupt politician with links to Kampala and Abu Dhabi. And while successive government offensives against myriad communities across the country may have diminished the government's standing, none could threaten the coterie of Dinka elite at Juba's centre. That still has not changed with the current offensive; it remains the brilliance and curse of Kiir's government that only the president can manage these vying forces. But what happens after the death of the ageing leader remains a concern, and an opportunity, for all.
Amid successive electoral delays and political atrophy, the SPLM-IO has repeatedly warned of the collapse of the 2018 peace agreement, even while it has appeared powerless to prevent Kiir's persistent meddling and the removal of its senior officials. Most egregious has been the detention and subsequent charging of Riek Machar, the first vice-president and leader of the opposition movement in 2025, in dubious connection with clashes in Nasir County with the White Army-- a coalition of Nuer self-defence militias. But such tensions finally appeared to prove too much towards the end of the year, with an alliance of SPLM-IO forces surging through Nuer-majority areas of Jonglei in recent weeks, overrunning government army positions in multiple locations, including at Pajut.
Opposition troops are now bearing down on the Dinka-majority state capital of Bor, where thousands of soldiers have massed in expectation of intense fighting in the coming days. And since the end of December, clashes have also erupted close to the oil fields in Unity state, near Juba in Morobo County of Central Equatoria, and at border positions in Eastern Equatoria, including near the Kenyan border. While intermittent clashes have persisted between these forces for months, the latest bout marks the most significant fighting since 2018. And according to UN figures, over 180,000 people have already been displaced in the conflict-affected states, accentuating the calamitous humanitarian situation across the nation. With further clashes anticipated, it remains to be seen just how far the assorted Nuer forces can push towards the capital-- and whether it will trigger broader Nuer-Dinka violence.
Meanwhile, Kiir has continued to sack and reshuffle his officials at a pace, often late at night and with no warning, in his usual style. On Monday, the president moved again, sacking the interior minister —the wife of Machar —and a host of other security officials. The veteran Warrap politician, Aleu Ayieny Aleu, has now been promoted to interior minister, having previously served in the post between 2013 and 2015 when the civil war was at its most intense. This post, too, is intended for the SPLM-IO, representing just another signal that the peace agreement has long since disintegrated.
These renewed clashes have certainly caught the headlines, particularly given that much of the analysis of South Sudan remains centred on the SPLM vs SPLM-IO lens. But government-allied ethnic militias and indiscriminate bombing have devastated communities in parts of Upper Nile, Western Equatoria, and Western Bahr el Ghazal since late 2024, often under the guise of removing checkpoints that hinder humanitarian aid delivery. Much of these offensives against disenfranchised, peripheral communities have been brutal, wresting the hinterland economies into the militarised orbit of the distant capital. Most heinous and one of the proximate causes of the surging violence today was the clashes in Nasir County, where Juba dropped incendiary barrel bombs on Nuer communities last March.
In turn, Machar and 7 senior SPLM-IO leaders were detained, and subsequently paraded on an unconstitutional show trial, charged with a host of crimes, including treason, murder, and terrorism. Few believe that Machar —whose own influence among the Nuer has faded significantly —played any role in the White Army's resistance to the government's offensive in Nasir. But Kiir is nothing if not an opportunist, and has wielded the incident to further diminish Machar.
Today, though, the Nuer-majority forces on the offensive in Jonglei are a fractious coalition, with multiple commanders jostling for supremacy. SPLM-IO units and local Nuer militias remain loosely aligned, with overlapping and often conflicting command structures. Among the leaders is SPLM-IO Operations Commander Lt. Gen. Wesley Welebe, who has ordered the general offensive. Following a meeting with SPLM-IO commanders in Central Equatoria, a video of Welebe demanding the release of Machar has been circulated, with the commander stating that "there is nothing called 'peace' anymore. Only regime change."
Even if spurred on by purported support from the Sudanese army, regime change may not yet be feasible. The systematic erosion of R-ARCSS has left the opposition much-weakened, with a multitude of their militias and units bribed and cajoled into the army's umbrella. And while there are profound schisms within the Dinka elite as the petrodollars dry up, the demoralised South Sudanese 'army'-- an unpaid coalition of mostly Dinka militias-- has not yet fractured. Further, Uganda has a vested interest in maintaining Kiir's hold in power, with the military having repeatedly intervened to protect the regime. But while a conceivable threat from the Nuer may paper over these cracks for the time being, the system of venal power and patronage cannot be sustained forever-- and particularly without the spider-like Kiir at the centre.
Foreign diplomats in vain have repeatedly pleaded with Kiir to return to the calamitous R-ARCSS treaty, failing to grasp that the horse had long since bolted. This remains a state fundamentally predicated on extraction, on division, on violence against its own civilians. Even so, a joint statement from various European partners, Canada, the US, and Japan was issued on Tuesday, calling on "all parties to agree to an immediate cessation of hostilities and to resolve issues through peaceful dialogue." Further, UNMISS has called for peace and dialogue, even while it nominally enjoys the strongest civilian protection mandate of any peacekeeping force, which was renewed in 2025. Yet it has repeatedly failed to carry out such responsibilities, declining to intervene against the litany of abuses conducted by government soldiers in Upper Nile, Unity, Western Bahr el Ghazal and Western Equatoria, and more besides. Yet there has been no 'peaceful dialogue' for years, with R-ARCSS providing the cover for Kiir's dismantling of the peace agreement-- which, anyhow, represented a surrender in all but name.
This is not yet a reversion to the nationwide civil war that engulfed South Sudan between 2013 and 2018, but it does mark a break from the managed instability that followed. While the country may be falling apart, it is yet to be seen whether the centre can hold —and whether the SPLM-IO can pose a genuine threat to the torrid politics of Juba. While Kiir's elite networks have been stretched thin by shrinking oil revenues and fractured patronage, the wily politician has repeatedly proven his ability to weather the most intense storms. Indeed, one might say that things fall apart in South Sudan not because the centre collapses, but because it survives—extractive, insulated, and reliant on violence to remain so.
The Horn Edition Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Once on the US-designated terrorist sanctions list, it is unsurprisingly rather difficult to come off it. And with the US designating the 'Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood' as terrorists, elements of Khartoum's military government may now have the dubious honour of being on it twice. First time out in 1993, Khartoum was deemed a US State Sponsor of Terror in the wake of a raft of jihadist plots linked to the Islamist authorities in Sudan. Nearly three decades later, and only after Sudan's partial ascension to the Abraham Accords, the title and punishing sanctions were lifted for the civilian-military transitional government. Today, though the warring Sudan is no longer home to an Osama bin Laden or Carlos the Jackal, a US labelling of 'terrorist' has returned to Khartoum.
At the end of February, Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed departed on a rather unusual visit to Baku, Azerbaijan. Slated as a meeting between two emerging powers, a focus on trade and investment frameworks was particularly emphasised by Foreign Minister Gedion Timotheos. More importantly, of course, was the signing of a comprehensive defence agreement by the two countries on 27 February. Spanning drone technology, armoured vehicles, artillery shell production, and air defence, the new agreement builds upon a framework from November 2025, which also included reference to refurbishing T-72 tanks, electronic warfare, and military-industrial manufacturing. Though war has not yet returned to Tigray as many feared, Abiy's vision of a militarised domestic —and regional —posture no doubt requires more hardware.
Earlier this month, dozens of heads of state and government gathered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, for the 39th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union (AU). The theme of this summit prioritised water security and sanitation, discussing various ways to address these issues amid the unrelenting climate crisis. A worthy subject, no doubt, but the geopolitical backdrop of the summit remains unremittingly grim. Taking place in Addis —amid war looking ever more likely in Tigray —the gathering of leaders again served to uncomfortably emphasise the decline of the AU.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, the Puntland Maritime Police Force in Somalia, or the Liyu Police in Ethiopia are far from isolated curiosities or aberrations of the modern security state in the Horn of Africa. Quite the opposite; each example of these 'paramilitary groups' are part of a longer tale, a reflection of the persistent outsourcing and politicisation of violence in the region. With no state historically able to exercise a monopoly of force, paramilitaries and parallel security structures have routinely sprung from the elite to mediate their authority, 'coup-proof' their regimes, and to deliberately fragment coercive power. But historical variation within and between the litany of paramilitary forces in the Horn is vast, spanning a wide breadth of political aims and ambitions, territories, armaments, and compositions. And yet, the results are often decidedly mixed, as perhaps best evidenced by the destruction of Sudan's ongoing war.
One merely has to drive a few miles down the sweltering tarmac road past the town of Isiolo to encounter the Kenyan army. Small Kenyan Defence Forces (KDF) checkpoints and outposts litter these roads and others, playing several roles in Kenya's arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) regions. Principal among them is, of course, interdicting the drips and drabs of Al-Shabaab militants infiltrating in small numbers from Somalia. But another prevalent role of past years – particularly since the 2020-2023 drought and ensuing intercommunal violence—has been the army's role in subduing the occurrence of pastoralist-based climate-accentuated conflict.
Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's diplomatic tour continues apace. Since 26 December and Israel's bombshell recognition of Somaliland, Hassan Sheikh has travelled to Türkiye, Ethiopia, and, in recent days, Egypt and Qatar, rallying support for his government, and Somalia's "unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity." And he has found success in three of these four, with Ankara, Cairo, and Doha sitting on one side of a broader Red Sea schism against the Emirati-Israeli axis. Somaliland ally, Emirati broker and regionally isolated Ethiopia, as ever, continues to hedge its bets
There are rivalries born from distance, and rivalries born from closeness. Nearly three decades of Ethiopia-Eritrea feuding —barring the brief, destructive interregnum in Tigray —is borne of the latter. The depth of the socio-cultural linkages between modern-day Ethiopia and Eritrea dates back centuries, with the shared highlands part of the sophisticated Axumite kingdom that stretched into the Arabian Peninsula.
Police officers restraining lawmakers in a parliamentary chamber is rarely a healthy sign of a functioning democracy. With just a couple of months left before the Somali president's term expires, his allies in parliament are plumbing fresh depths to cement the latest centralising revisions to the Provisional Constitution. And in the past week alone, dozens more opposition MPs have been summarily thrown out after resisting such unilateral amendments in scenes reminiscent of a 20th-century putsch, rather than a putative parliamentary democracy. Plans to declare a parallel parliament are now underway.
A tentative calm has returned to the South West city of Baidoa. On Wednesday afternoon, heavy fighting broke out in the town's western neighbourhoods, and after two days of bloody clashes, dozens appear to be injured or killed. What began as a land dispute near Baidoa's livestock market quickly degenerated, pulling in forces aligned with a federal minister as intense gunfire and mortars rocked the city. This was no small matter —and despite assertions that it was a case of disarming rogue forces, it was anything but, and instead appears to be the latest product of ratcheting electoral tensions. With South West President Abdiaziz Laftagareen today announcing the expulsion of the government's most senior electoral official from Baidoa, is this the final straw for the fractious Baidoa-Mogadishu relationship?